Technology protection: patents, secrets and code
We will sort your technology into the parts that the law treats differently: the code, the invention, the data and the closed know-how, and put the right mechanism under each one of them.
Patent term
Срок патента
20 years from filing
20 лет с даты подачи
Publication
Публикация
public at 18 months
на 18-м месяце
Entering countries
Вход в страны
~30 months to decide
~30 месяцев на решение
A closed method
Закрытое знание
no expiry date
без срока действия
When you need to protect a technology

A rival shipped your feature
The screens are different and the thing it does is the same. What you can do now was settled earlier, by what you filed and what you kept quiet.
You are about to show it
A demo, a conference talk, a paper. Once a technical detail is out in the open, the routes that ask for novelty start closing behind it.
The engineer who knew it leaves
The method lived in one head and one repository. What stays with you is what was written down and put behind controlled access before the notice.
The data set is the product
You gathered it, cleaned it and labelled it. What the law hands you here covers the collection you built and stops short of the material inside.
A partner wants to see inside
A joint project puts your method on somebody else’s table. What can be shown and what stays closed is decided before the first meeting, not after it.
What you get
- Every protectable part, named
- A filing plan with dates
- A secrecy regime that holds
- Confidentiality terms in contracts
- A calendar of expiry dates
What is required to protect a technology

A technology is never one legal object. Inside one product sit written code, a technical solution, a gathered data set and a method nobody outside the team has seen, and each of those is held by a different mechanism with its own conditions.
The first decision is the one that cannot be taken back: what goes into an application and what stays closed. An application buys a right that others can be stopped with, and pays for it with publication. Secrecy asks for no filing and no fee, and ends the day it leaks.
Where the value sits
- The repositories, and which parts of them were written here and which arrived from elsewhere.
- The technical solution: what it does that nothing published before it does.
- The data the product runs on: where each part came from and on what terms.
- The methods nobody has published: who holds them and who can reach them.
- Every disclosure already made: talks, papers, public repositories, investor decks and supplier discussions, with dates.
What we will need
- Contracts with everyone who built it
- The list of what the product is made of
- Any applications already filed
- The record of what has been shown in public
If a document does not exist, we will name whatever sits in its place. Working out who holds the rights across the whole company is a full rights audit; fixing the date on a version is deposit and escrow; a copy already on sale is protection from clones.
Four routes, one technology
A patent
It gives you a right others can be stopped with, and it asks for the invention in writing, clear enough for a skilled reader to build it. New, inventive and usable in industry are the conditions it is measured against.
A closely held method
Nothing is filed and nothing expires, for as long as the information is secret, has commercial value because it is secret, and is kept that way by reasonable measures. A leak ends it, and so does a rival who gets there alone.
The written code
Code is held as it was written, from the moment it exists, with no application needed for it to arise. It reaches the way the thing was written and leaves what it does open.
The data set
A collection becomes an object of its own when the choosing or the arranging of its contents is itself a creation. That protection stops at the arrangement and reaches neither the material inside nor anyone else’s rights in it.
Sources: the twenty-year minimum from the filing date, the three conditions for undisclosed information and the rules on code and data compilations are set by the agreement on trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights. It binds its member states and works through the law each of them enacts. Eighteen-month publication and the thirty-month deadline: the organization running that route.
Stages of work
Splitting the technology into layers — 2–3 working days.
The first list is of everything the product runs on, split by the mechanism able to hold each part: written code, a technical solution, the data, the closed method.
Reading what is already public.
We will collect every disclosure with its date: talks, papers, public repositories, decks and supplier threads.
This has to come before any filing decision, because novelty is measured against what is already out there, and countries differ on whether your own earlier disclosure is forgiven.
Choosing what to file and what to keep closed.
For each part we will say which mechanism it can realistically stand on, and what the other choice would cost.
A published application is readable by everyone, including the rival who would otherwise have had to work it out.
Writing the secrecy down so it counts.
A method is only closely held while somebody can show the measures: named recipients, access by role, marked documents, exit procedures.
We will draft those measures and the confidentiality terms that carry them into contracts with staff, contractors and suppliers.
Preparing and filing what is filed.
The description has to let a skilled reader build the thing, and the claims decide what you can actually stop. We will prepare both and file them in the offices that cover your markets and your production.
The calendar of dates that expire.
The priority year, the usual thirty-month deadline for entering each country on the international route, renewal dates and the review of access to the closed material.
You get one list with the dates that cannot be moved marked as such.
Everything else we do around rights and content lives in the IP & Content area.
Our case studies
FAQ
The answer is national. The international agreement says patents shall be available for inventions in all fields of technology that are new, involve an inventive step and are capable of industrial application. Each office then applies that to software in its own way, and some exclude a computer program as such while still examining a wider technical invention built around it. We will check the offices that matter for your markets before anyone calls a product patentable.
By asking one question: can somebody take your product apart and see how it works. If so, the method will be known anyway and an application gives you something to stop them with. If they cannot, publication hands over for free what nobody could otherwise reach. The second question is time: a patent runs twenty years from the filing date and only for as long as it is kept in force, while a closed method has no expiry date and no protection against a rival who works it out alone.
Yes, and that is the price of the right. An application has to describe the invention clearly enough for a skilled reader to carry it out. On the international route the text is published about eighteen months after the earliest filing date, and until that moment nobody outside can see the file unless you let them. If you withdraw before publication, it does not happen at all. That window is the last point at which the choice between filing and staying closed is still open.
The collection, yes; the material inside it, no. A compilation of data is protected as an object of its own where the selection or the arrangement of its contents amounts to a creation, and that protection does not extend to the material itself, nor to anyone else's rights already sitting in it. So how you assembled, cleaned and labelled the set can be yours while each item inside stays whoever's it was. Where the set came under someone else's terms or describes real people, those terms decide more.
Discuss
the Task
Speak to our team
Speak to our team. Tell us about your task –
we’ll help you with it in any jurisdiction.

