Technology protection: patents, secrets and code

We will sort your technology into the parts that the law treats differently: the code, the invention, the data and the closed know-how, and put the right mechanism under each one of them.

 

Patent term

Срок патента

20 years from filing

20 лет с даты подачи

Publication

Публикация

public at 18 months

на 18-м месяце

Entering countries

Вход в страны

~30 months to decide

~30 месяцев на решение

A closed method

Закрытое знание

no expiry date

без срока действия

When you need to protect a technology

A rival shipped your feature

The screens are different and the thing it does is the same. What you can do now was settled earlier, by what you filed and what you kept quiet.

You are about to show it

A demo, a conference talk, a paper. Once a technical detail is out in the open, the routes that ask for novelty start closing behind it.

The engineer who knew it leaves

The method lived in one head and one repository. What stays with you is what was written down and put behind controlled access before the notice.

The data set is the product

You gathered it, cleaned it and labelled it. What the law hands you here covers the collection you built and stops short of the material inside.

A partner wants to see inside

A joint project puts your method on somebody else’s table. What can be shown and what stays closed is decided before the first meeting, not after it.

What you get

  • Every protectable part, named
  • A filing plan with dates
  • A secrecy regime that holds
  • Confidentiality terms in contracts
  • A calendar of expiry dates

What is required to protect a technology

A technology is never one legal object. Inside one product sit written code, a technical solution, a gathered data set and a method nobody outside the team has seen, and each of those is held by a different mechanism with its own conditions.

The first decision is the one that cannot be taken back: what goes into an application and what stays closed. An application buys a right that others can be stopped with, and pays for it with publication. Secrecy asks for no filing and no fee, and ends the day it leaks.

Where the value sits

  • The repositories, and which parts of them were written here and which arrived from elsewhere.
  • The technical solution: what it does that nothing published before it does.
  • The data the product runs on: where each part came from and on what terms.
  • The methods nobody has published: who holds them and who can reach them.
  • Every disclosure already made: talks, papers, public repositories, investor decks and supplier discussions, with dates.

What we will need

  • Contracts with everyone who built it
  • The list of what the product is made of
  • Any applications already filed
  • The record of what has been shown in public

If a document does not exist, we will name whatever sits in its place. Working out who holds the rights across the whole company is a full rights audit; fixing the date on a version is deposit and escrow; a copy already on sale is protection from clones.

Four routes, one technology

A patent

It gives you a right others can be stopped with, and it asks for the invention in writing, clear enough for a skilled reader to build it. New, inventive and usable in industry are the conditions it is measured against.

A closely held method

Nothing is filed and nothing expires, for as long as the information is secret, has commercial value because it is secret, and is kept that way by reasonable measures. A leak ends it, and so does a rival who gets there alone.

The written code

Code is held as it was written, from the moment it exists, with no application needed for it to arise. It reaches the way the thing was written and leaves what it does open.

The data set

A collection becomes an object of its own when the choosing or the arranging of its contents is itself a creation. That protection stops at the arrangement and reaches neither the material inside nor anyone else’s rights in it.

Sources: the twenty-year minimum from the filing date, the three conditions for undisclosed information and the rules on code and data compilations are set by the agreement on trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights. It binds its member states and works through the law each of them enacts. Eighteen-month publication and the thirty-month deadline: the organization running that route.

Stages of work

Splitting the technology into layers — 2–3 working days.

The first list is of everything the product runs on, split by the mechanism able to hold each part: written code, a technical solution, the data, the closed method.

Reading what is already public.

We will collect every disclosure with its date: talks, papers, public repositories, decks and supplier threads.

This has to come before any filing decision, because novelty is measured against what is already out there, and countries differ on whether your own earlier disclosure is forgiven.

Choosing what to file and what to keep closed.

For each part we will say which mechanism it can realistically stand on, and what the other choice would cost.

A published application is readable by everyone, including the rival who would otherwise have had to work it out.

Writing the secrecy down so it counts.

A method is only closely held while somebody can show the measures: named recipients, access by role, marked documents, exit procedures.

We will draft those measures and the confidentiality terms that carry them into contracts with staff, contractors and suppliers.

Preparing and filing what is filed.

The description has to let a skilled reader build the thing, and the claims decide what you can actually stop. We will prepare both and file them in the offices that cover your markets and your production.

The calendar of dates that expire.

The priority year, the usual thirty-month deadline for entering each country on the international route, renewal dates and the review of access to the closed material.

You get one list with the dates that cannot be moved marked as such.

Everything else we do around rights and content lives in the IP & Content area.

Our case studies

No items found.

Leaders of the Area

Alexandra Kurdyumova

Alexandra

Kurdyumova

arrow_outward
Anton Karpenko

Anton

Karpenko

arrow_outward

FAQ

Can software be patented?
add
remove
Patent or secret: how do you choose?
add
remove
Does filing a patent make the invention public?
add
remove
Can we protect the data our model learned from?
add
remove

Discuss
the Task

Speak to our team

Speak to our team. Tell us about your task –

we’ll help you with it in any jurisdiction.

Tell us about your task –
we’ll help you with it in any jurisdiction.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

We use cookies to improve your experience.